Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 171 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 233 NM | 222 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 25 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 477 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1640 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`210 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |