Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Sentra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1640 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`070 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |