Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1754 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 53 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |