Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 6 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 55 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 422 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |