Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 133 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2015: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by sending up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 27 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |