Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 986 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan X-Trail has 330 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 891 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |