Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 9 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 1.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.90 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 2360 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 500 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |