Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Hyundai Tucson 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Despite less power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 17 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1503 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 37 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 374 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan X-Trail, so Hyundai Tucson quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |