Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 54 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Used also on Opel Antara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller. Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 97 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1577 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 73 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |