Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Audi Q5 2012

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Nissan X-Trail
2014 - 2017
Audi Q5
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Hybrid
Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Audi Q5) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions.

Performance

Power: 130 HP245 HP
Torque: 320 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds7.1 seconds
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan X-Trail engine produces 115 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 5.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: 11.10 € no data
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Diesel€/l
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1170 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1090 km on highway
830 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 210 mm (8.3 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you.
Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ...  More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.90 m
Height: 1.71 m1.63 m
Nissan X-Trail is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1877 litres1560 litres
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity.
Nissan X-Trail has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 317 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`310 kg2`490 kg
Net weight:1`590 kg1`910 kg
Load capacity:720 kg580 kg
Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Audi Q5. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Audi Q5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 860013 000
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Audi Q5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv