Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 60 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi A5, Audi Q3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |