Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda HR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine Honda CR-V 2013 1.6 engine: The Honda N16A diesel can be a good choice when properly maintained, but it is not the easiest engine to own in markets where it is rare. Its long-term reliability depends heavily on good fuel, frequent fuel ... More about Honda CR-V 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |