Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 33 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 12 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 94 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 309 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |