Nissan X-Trail 2022 vs Mercedes GLC 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLC can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 - 184 HP | 163 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 - 300 NM | 250 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 9.6 seconds | 3.5 - 8.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes GLC are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 7.6 | 0.8 - 10.2 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 194 - 300 mm (7.6 - 11.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is smaller, but higher. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes GLC, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 585 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1424 litres | 1680 litres | |
|
Mercedes GLC has more luggage space. Nissan X-Trail has 35 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 256 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1.9 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`302 kg | ~ 2`625 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`703 kg | ~ 2`010 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 599 kg | ~ 615 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |