Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 177 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 380 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 6.8 | 1.7 - 10.6 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, a Nissan X-Trail with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | 1792 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 415 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`284 kg | ~ 2`182 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`671 kg | ~ 1`591 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 613 kg | ~ 591 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |