Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2001 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail 2003 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail 2003 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 165 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 270 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 10.0 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2001 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail 2003. On average, a Nissan X-Trail 2001 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan X-Trail 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail 2001 and Nissan X-Trail 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail 2001 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail 2003, which means Nissan X-Trail 2001 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |