Nissan X-Trail 2001 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda Tribute can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda Tribute also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 165 HP | 124 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 270 NM | 175 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.7 seconds | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 10.0 | 9.4 - 12.8 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Tribute. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Mazda Tribute, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 2245 litres | |
|
Mazda Tribute has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 404 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`010 | ~ 1`992 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |