Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
Torque: | 192 - 314 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.0 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
Nissan X-Trail 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail 2007. On average, Nissan X-Trail 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2007. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.51 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Nissan X-Trail 2003 is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail 2007, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 479 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1841 litres | 1742 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail 2003 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail 2007. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail 2003 (by 99 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail 2003 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail 2007. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`009 | ~ 2`079 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |