Nissan X-Trail 2003 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 - 314 NM | 176 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Outlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.0 | 7.5 - 10.6 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail has 131 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`009 kg | ~ 2`331 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`466 kg | ~ 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 543 kg | ~ 666 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Mitsubishi Outlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |