Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 173 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 360 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.6 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan X-Trail is 7 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 29 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`079 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |