Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 173 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 360 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.6 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 77 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 787 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`079 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |