Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan X-Trail
2007 - 2010
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 141 - 173 HP140 - 166 HP
Torque: 196 - 360 NM192 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 12.5 seconds10.2 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1 - 9.66.5 - 9.5
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.52 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Nissan X-Trail is 11 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 479 litres556 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1742 litres955 litres
Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 77 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 787 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan X-Trail can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`079~ 2`105
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 52005800
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan X-Trail has
  • also available in 2WD
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv