Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Grand Vitara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 173 HP | 106 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 360 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 11.5 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.6 | 7.0 - 9.4 | |
|
On average, the Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 58 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`079 | ~ 1`888 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |