Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 173 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 360 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.6 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail 2003. On average, Nissan X-Trail 2007 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2007 is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan X-Trail 2007 is 12 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail 2003, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail 2007 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2007 has 69 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail 2003. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail 2003 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail 2007 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`079 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |