Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 173 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 360 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.6 | 7.4 - 9.5 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1773 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 79 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`146 | ~ 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |