Nissan X-Trail 2010 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Grand Vitara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 173 HP | 106 - 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 233 - 360 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 11.7 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.6 | 6.8 - 9.7 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 38 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 603 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1773 litres | 758 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 205 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1015 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`146 | ~ 2`057 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |