Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan Tiida is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Tiida engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Nissan Tiida reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Tiida 2007 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Nissan Tiida is smaller, but higher. Nissan Tiida is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Tiida is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
467 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Tiida has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`658 kg | 1`770 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`278 kg | 1`195 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 380 kg | 575 kg | |
| Nissan Tiida load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 51 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |