Nissan Tiida 2007 vs BMW 3 series 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Tiida engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 47 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Nissan Tiida reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The Nissan Tiida is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Tiida consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Nissan Tiida over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Tiida 2007 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Nissan Tiida is smaller, but higher. Nissan Tiida is 4 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Tiida is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
467 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Tiida is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Nissan Tiida can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`658 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`278 kg | 1`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 380 kg | 515 kg | |
| Nissan Tiida load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem less than BMW 3 series. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |