Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Tiida is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Tiida engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Nissan Tiida reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Tiida consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Tiida could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Tiida consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Tiida 2007 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Nissan Tiida is smaller, but higher. Nissan Tiida is 10 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Tiida is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
467 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Tiida has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Tiida has 37 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`745 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |