Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Hyundai i30 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 126 HP | |
Torque: | 153 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Tiida engine produces 16 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Nissan Tiida reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.9 | |
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Tiida consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Tiida could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Tiida engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 20 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Nissan Tiida 2007 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Hyundai i30 2011 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
Nissan Tiida is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Tiida is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 272 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Tiida has 68 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. This could mean that the Nissan Tiida uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Tiida is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |