Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Renault Megane 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Tiida engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Megane, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Tiida consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Tiida could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Tiida consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.49 m | |
| Nissan Tiida and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 272 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Nissan Tiida has 133 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Tiida is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Nissan Tiida can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Renault Megane has
| |