Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Hyundai i30 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Nissan Tiida engine produces 10 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Hyundai i30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Tiida consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Tiida could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Tiida consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Tiida is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Tiida is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 272 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Tiida has 68 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. This could mean that the Nissan Tiida uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Tiida is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |