Nissan Tiida 2007 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.8 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 126 HP | 75 - 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 240 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 12.6 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.8 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Nissan Tiida petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. On average, Nissan Tiida equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.47 m | |
| Nissan Tiida is 11 cm longer than the Kia RIO, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Tiida is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
467 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Tiida has 33 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. This could mean that the Nissan Tiida uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Tiida is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia RIO. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`697 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Tiida has
|
Kia RIO has
| |