Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 154 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Nissan Terrano engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
Nissan Terrano consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 415 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`810 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |