Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.7 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
| |