Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 94 HP less power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Nissan Murano. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 12.3 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller, but higher. Nissan Terrano is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2005 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 808 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 105 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |