Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Lexus RX 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 50 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 21 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 12.2 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller, but higher. Nissan Terrano is 1 cm shorter than the Lexus RX, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2130 litres | |
|
Lexus RX has more luggage space. Nissan Terrano has 324 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Lexus RX has
| |