Nissan Terrano 2002 vs BMW X5 2003

 
Nissan Terrano
2002 - 2005
BMW X5
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 154 HP218 HP
Torque: 304 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds8.8 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Terrano engine produces 64 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 196 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.19.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1160 km on highway
830 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 27 years3 years
Engine spread: Used also on Nissan PatrolInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ...  More about BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.67 m
Width: 1.76 m1.87 m
Height: 1.81 m1.72 m
Nissan Terrano is 6 cm longer than the BMW X5, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 115 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1900 litres1550 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 350 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 3`000 kg2`695 kg
Net weight:1`950 kg2`170 kg
Load capacity:1`050 kg525 kg
Nissan Terrano load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem more than BMW X5. Therefore, Nissan Terrano is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 34004800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Terrano has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv