Nissan Terrano 2002 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 30 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 106 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 6 cm longer than the BMW X5, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 350 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
BMW X5 has
| |