Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 19 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |