Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano 2000 and Nissan Terrano 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Terrano 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.9 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano 2000 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Terrano 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Nissan Terrano 2000 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano 2002, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano 2000 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |