Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 38 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 11 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |