Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 38 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Terrano consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 989 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |