Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 43 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano is 50 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 563 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 9 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |