Nissan Terrano 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 47 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 19 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |