Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano and Mitsubishi Pajero have the same engine power, but Nissan Terrano torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |