Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Terrano engine produces 25 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 22 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 705 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan Terrano can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |