Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Opel Frontera 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Terrano engine produces 9 HP more power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Opel Frontera. Thanks to more power Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Frontera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Frontera, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Terrano is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1720 litres | |
| Nissan Terrano has 425 litres less trunk space than the Opel Frontera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |