Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Nissan Pathfinder 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 279 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.5 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Terrano consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1670 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 320 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |