Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is larger. Nissan Terrano is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 11 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 28 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
| |