Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Mercedes ML 1999

 
Nissan Terrano
1996 - 2000
Mercedes ML
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.7 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 125 HP163 HP
Torque: 278 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.7 seconds11.7 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Terrano engine produces 38 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.4
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Terrano consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Terrano could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway900 km on highway
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.59 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.85 m1.78 m
Nissan Terrano is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 115 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1900 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`8003`365
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 22002200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Terrano has
  • lower price
Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv