Nissan Terrano 1996 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Terrano engine produces 11 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 8 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Terrano is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |